Free PC Help




Reply
Old 06-06-2008, 05:57 PM   #1 (permalink)
Free PC Help Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3

Question Which CPU is faster?

Hi guys

Could anyone tell me which of these CPU's is faster at running 1 program at a time?


Intel® Processor Q6600 Quad Core™ (2.40GHz, 1066Mhz FSB, 8MB cache)
or
XPS 420 E8500 Core 2 Duo Processor (3.16GHz, 6MB, 1333MHz)

If you could tell me why as well that would be great.

Thanks Jay
yammer5 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 06-06-2008, 06:32 PM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Wolfeymole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 4,565

Operating System: Windows Vista - Home Premium
PC Experience: Enough to choke a Mule
Default

Have a read of this Yammer

Dual-Core Versus Quad-Core: Intel Core 2 Duo/Quad Processors of New and Old Generations
__________________
Need help with your computer problems? Then why not join Free PC Help. Register here

If Free PC Help has helped you then please consider a donation. Click here

We are all members helping other members.
Please return here where you may be able to help someone else.
After all, no one knows everything and you may have the answer that someone needs.
Wolfeymole is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 08:59 PM   #3 (permalink)
Free PC Help Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3

Default

Thanks that was very interesting, im still unsure lol in the tests the MHz were the same on the duo and the quad and the duo came close, but on the duo ive seen the Mhz is higher so im thinking it might beat the quad?
yammer5 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 12:10 AM   #4 (permalink)
Tech Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Meath, Ireland
Posts: 43

PC Experience: Elite PC Guru
Send a message via MSN to Flair4it
Default

hmmm i would go for the quad core altough the 420 is seriously fast system.
__________________
Need help with your computer problems? Then why not join Free PC Help. Register here

If Free PC Help has helped you then please consider a donation. Click here
Flair4it is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 08:40 AM   #5 (permalink)
Free PC Help Long Term Member
 
AdvancedSetup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: 34° 12' 35" N, 118° 29' 21" W
Posts: 890

Operating System: Server 2003 Enterprise
PC Experience: Systems Engineer
Default

Its not a matter of faster per say. It depends on what you're going to run on your system. If you're going to run an application like AutoCAD, PhotoShop, 3D Rendering software, etc then the Quad Core will be the winner hands down.

If you're just wanting to run a single threaded application then the other would be faster.
__________________
Need help with your computer problems? Then why not join Free PC Help. Register here
If Free PC Help has helped you then please consider a donation. Click here

Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware | Malwarebytes' Products | SUPERAntispyware | HijackThis | Spybot Search & Destroy | hpHosts | SpywareBlaster | WinPatrol | SiteHound | FireFox | NoScript | Adblock Plus | Sandboxie | Acronis True Image | ThreatFire | ESET Online Scanner | Kaspersky Online Scanner | Panda Online Scanner | Trend Online Scanner | Avira AntiVir Personal | Avast Free AV | CCleaner | ATF-Cleaner | Online Armor Firewall | Outpost Firewall Free | DirectX | Office Compatibility Pack | Office 2003 (SP3) | SubInACL | Windows Defender | Windows Installer 3.1 | IE7 XP | XP SP3 for IT | Sysinternals | Virtual PC 2007 | Returnil


We are all members helping other members.
Please return here where you may be able to help someone else.
After all, no one knows everything and you may have the answer that someone needs.
AdvancedSetup is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 08:45 AM   #6 (permalink)
Advanced Tech, Hardware & Component Specialist
 
Dalo Harkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Stockport near Manchester
Posts: 2,447

Operating System: Windows Vista - Home Premium
PC Experience: Pc Guru
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yammer5 View Post
Hi guys

Could anyone tell me which of these CPU's is faster at running 1 program at a time?


Intel® Processor Q6600 Quad Core™ (2.40GHz, 1066Mhz FSB, 8MB cache)
or
XPS 420 E8500 Core 2 Duo Processor (3.16GHz, 6MB, 1333MHz)

If you could tell me why as well that would be great.

Thanks Jay
As Advanced Setup has said in terms of playing games the second is faster as it has a faster speed - but if the program you are using supports quad core then that is the better choice - on the other hand you can easily overclock the Quad to run at 3.6Ghz per core with air cooling
And that would seriously beat any CPU out there that doesn't cost you an arm and a leg!
__________________
Intel Q6600 @ 4Ghz (Watercooled)
Asus P5K premium black pearl
2GB OCZ Reaper 8500
260GTX

Join Free PC Help - Register here

Donations are welcome - here

PC Build


We are all members helping other members.
Please return here where you may be able to help someone else.
After all, no one knows everything and you may have the answer that someone needs.
Dalo Harkin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 09:01 AM   #7 (permalink)
Free PC Help Long Term Member
 
AdvancedSetup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: 34° 12' 35" N, 118° 29' 21" W
Posts: 890

Operating System: Server 2003 Enterprise
PC Experience: Systems Engineer
Default

Well the Nehalem which isn't even released already smokes every other CPU in its early beta stage.

Nehalem


.
__________________
Need help with your computer problems? Then why not join Free PC Help. Register here
If Free PC Help has helped you then please consider a donation. Click here

Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware | Malwarebytes' Products | SUPERAntispyware | HijackThis | Spybot Search & Destroy | hpHosts | SpywareBlaster | WinPatrol | SiteHound | FireFox | NoScript | Adblock Plus | Sandboxie | Acronis True Image | ThreatFire | ESET Online Scanner | Kaspersky Online Scanner | Panda Online Scanner | Trend Online Scanner | Avira AntiVir Personal | Avast Free AV | CCleaner | ATF-Cleaner | Online Armor Firewall | Outpost Firewall Free | DirectX | Office Compatibility Pack | Office 2003 (SP3) | SubInACL | Windows Defender | Windows Installer 3.1 | IE7 XP | XP SP3 for IT | Sysinternals | Virtual PC 2007 | Returnil


We are all members helping other members.
Please return here where you may be able to help someone else.
After all, no one knows everything and you may have the answer that someone needs.
AdvancedSetup is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 06:24 AM   #8 (permalink)
Advanced Tech, Hardware & Component Specialist
 
Dalo Harkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Stockport near Manchester
Posts: 2,447

Operating System: Windows Vista - Home Premium
PC Experience: Pc Guru
Default

Only at stock my friend - there is NO WAY that chip is capable of overclocking as much as the Q6600 GO SLACR

Quad core from 2.4(stock) to 4.0(Oc'ed) even the newer quads can't run that fast.

thats a 16Ghz chip for £150 obviously you need a whopping cooler that would cost £200-£300 but we will overlook that
__________________
Intel Q6600 @ 4Ghz (Watercooled)
Asus P5K premium black pearl
2GB OCZ Reaper 8500
260GTX

Join Free PC Help - Register here

Donations are welcome - here

PC Build


We are all members helping other members.
Please return here where you may be able to help someone else.
After all, no one knows everything and you may have the answer that someone needs.
Dalo Harkin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 08:09 AM   #9 (permalink)
Advanced Tech, Hardware & Component Specialist
 
Dalo Harkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Stockport near Manchester
Posts: 2,447

Operating System: Windows Vista - Home Premium
PC Experience: Pc Guru
Default

UPDATED - the swiftech H20-120 Compact, will now achieve the 4GHZ O'c and will set you back around £130 - the pump is housed in the CPU block and there are 2 variations of this cooler the H20 -120 and the H20 - 220, the 120 is a single radiator and the 220 is a double radiator.
__________________
Intel Q6600 @ 4Ghz (Watercooled)
Asus P5K premium black pearl
2GB OCZ Reaper 8500
260GTX

Join Free PC Help - Register here

Donations are welcome - here

PC Build


We are all members helping other members.
Please return here where you may be able to help someone else.
After all, no one knows everything and you may have the answer that someone needs.

Last edited by Dalo Harkin; 06-24-2008 at 08:12 AM.
Dalo Harkin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes